The conference encouraged real work. One and one-half days of small group sessions, filled with the 100 participants, yielded (at least) the following:
• The curriculum for a class on building trust in conflict situations being taught at Stanford this quarter
• A "responsibility for harm"
checklist
• A framing document on different types
of consent - (being carried forward by
Responsible Data Forum and others)
• A prototype for analyzing the ethics
of algorithms
• A 24 month "urgent issues"
idea set
• A research agenda (the Digital Civil Society Lab will move some of this forward)
• Specific opportunities for commercial
data firms to develop consistent policies for
sharing data with researchers and
nonprofits
• Mock-up for nonprofit Terms of
Service agreements to align with their
missions
(being carried forward by Responsible Data Forum and others)
(being carried forward by Responsible Data Forum and others)
• Two(!) draft codes of ethics for data
in civil society
• A set of tools for making ethical
decisions across the data lifecycle
• A data "badger" for ethical
management of data in civil society
• A matrix for locating use cases
within and across sectors
• A process for data scientists and
nonprofits to articulate and document
the ethical choices they made in
building apps, making visualizations or analyzing
data sets
• 100 people from universities,
nonprofits, policymaking, and a variety ofdigital data/media companies
creating 100! new relationships
The actual materials will be shared in a variety of ways, including here and on the conference website stanford.io/ethicsofdata
Blog
Posts by Participants
Heather
Leson
Christopher
Wilson
Summary
document on conference (forthcoming)
If I missed something, let me know. More soon!
No comments:
Post a Comment